Subsidized childcare. Free preschool. Child tax credits. The Democrats are pushing a long list of entitlements worth trillions of dollars, but the White House seems to give little attention to an area that is in dire need: Social Security
Since 2010, the annual costs for the Social Security program have exceeded its income. This is slowly draining its two trust funds, and the latest projections by the Social Security Board of Trustees are that the program will become insolvent by 2035.
The latest report by the Social Security Administration shows that promised benefits exceed payroll tax revenue by almost $60 trillion, $6.8 trillion more than just one year ago. Once the Social Security programs become insolvent in 2035, the Trustees project that benefits will be cut by 20% for each and every beneficiary.
The deficit for 2022 is estimated at $112 billion, and within the next decade the annual deficits will increase to close to $2.5 billion.
Too many beneficiaries… too few taxpayers… or both?
The main reason for the increase in the gap between promised benefits and tax revenue is that the expected fertility rate has been lowered. And the fertility rate is key because Social Security relies on tax revenue for funding: Fewer new taxpayers to replace those retiring means less revenue.
In 1935, when President Roosevelt established Social Security, 16 workers paid into the program for each beneficiary. Since then, the program has been expanded to include a much broader range of beneficiaries, benefits have been increased, and the retirement age has been lowered. Today, there are less than three workers for each beneficiary.
A lower fertility rate will only make the problem worse, and it’s projected that the number of workers per beneficiary will drop to just above 2 over the coming decades. In addition, as millions of Americans reach retirement age over the next few years, the workforce will decrease.
How can Social Security be fixed?
Politicians have attempted to fix Social Security before, but their tweaks failed to fix the program’s long-term problems. They have raised taxes and extended the retirement age, but the core problem remains: There are too many beneficiaries and too few working taxpayers to cover the expenses, and the situation will only get worse.
With more retirees and fewer workers, our elected officials will need to take action, and they are left with few options: either raise taxes or cut other government services. The question is whether they’ll do what’s necessary now or kick the can down the road until they have no choice but to act.